Home / Results
Four real findings, anonymised
What we find inside a limo company's marketing
Every figure below came out of one chauffeur company's actual accounts. None was hidden. All four sat in plain sight in tools the owner already had access to, and none had been noticed. Three of them I went on to fix myself. That is the normal state of this industry, not an unusual one.
Their website was competing against itself
Fourteen separate blog posts, published over several years with good intentions, all targeting the same primary search term. Google could not decide which one to rank, so it ranked none of them well.
Meanwhile the homepage sat at position 14 for the term the whole business is built on. The content was not bad. There was simply too much of it pointed at the same place.
Why it matters: the fix is consolidation, not more writing. Merging competing pages and redirecting the rest usually raises visibility without publishing a single new article.
What I did: consolidated fourteen airport pages into one with exact-match 301 redirects, merged a second airport's three competing pages into a fourth, and deindexed ten off-topic pages.
Their competitor was pulling away and nobody was watching
In one thirty day window, the operator's nearest local competitor gained 35 new page-one keywords. In the same window, this operator lost two.
Most owners check their own ranking occasionally. Almost nobody tracks competitor momentum, which means the gap is invisible until it is already a problem. Standing still in local search is not a plateau, it is a widening gap.
Why it matters: a 37 keyword swing in a month compounds. Six months of that is not a deficit you close with a bigger content budget.
This one is not a fix. It is a reason to measure, and the reason competitor movement sits in the monthly report rather than being noticed a year late.
Their best customers were switched off in the ad account
The 55 to 64 age segment, corporate and executive travellers, was converting at 23 percent. That was the strongest converting audience in the account.
It also carried a minus 90 percent bid adjustment, which is close to switching it off entirely. Budget was flowing instead toward segments converting at a fraction of the rate.
Why it matters: nobody chose this. It was set once, probably years earlier, and never reviewed against what the account was actually producing.
What I did: removed the suppressive bid adjustments, and implemented the conversion tracking the account had been running for years without, so it could optimise toward bookings instead of clicks.
Their highest-margin service had never actually launched
The luxury and executive ad group, almost certainly the highest-value work the business does, showed zero spend and zero impressions across several months. It existed in the account and had never run.
At the same time, real organic demand was appearing for that exact service with no page built to capture it. Buyers were searching for the most profitable thing the company sells and finding nothing.
Why it matters: this is not an optimisation problem. It is revenue that was never given a chance to arrive.
What I did: rebuilt and launched the ad group, added negative keywords to stop budget leaking to rideshare comparison terms, and shifted spend toward high-value searches.
These are findings, not outcomes
Everything above is a diagnosis and, on three of the four, the work I did about it. What is deliberately missing is what happened next. There are no percentage lifts, revenue figures or ranking improvements on this page, because those numbers have not been agreed for publication and WEBsaj does not publish figures it cannot evidence.
Finding a problem and correcting it is something I can show you. Claiming what it earned afterwards is something you would have to take on trust, so it is not on this page.
The honest version of where this business is
There is one client engagement. The findings from it are real and appear across this site. The outcome data is not published because it has not been agreed with that client, and naming a client without written permission is not something an agency should do.
If you need named references and published results before you hire someone, this is not the right time to hire me. That is a reasonable thing to need, and the free week exists precisely because it lets you judge the work directly instead of taking a case study on trust.
- No client name, logo or domain appears anywhere on this site
- No aggregate statistics, because there is one client
- No testimonials, because none have been collected
- No partner badges, because none are held
- No ranking guarantees, because nobody can honestly make one
What we would look for in yours
The same five things, and all of it from public data. No account access, no logins, no permission needed. Every finding above came from tools that read what anyone can see.
- Google Business Profile. Verified, categorised correctly, service area set properly, posting inside policy, review velocity against local rivals
- Cannibalisation. How many of your own pages compete for the same term, and where your money page actually ranks for it
- Competitor momentum. Page-one keywords gained and lost over 30 days, yours against your nearest rival
- Service coverage. Which of the eight buyer types you have no page for: airport, corporate, wedding, prom, cruise port, funeral, sports and events, private aviation
- Content and occasion gaps. Posting cadence, video presence, and whether you published for prom, graduation and New Year in time to catch the bookings
All four findings on this page were located in under an hour. Yours will not take longer.
The full case study
Lucca Transportation, West Palm Beach
The engagement behind these findings is now written up in full and published with the client's permission. It covers the April baseline of zero keywords in the top three, the work I did, the terms that now sit at position five to seven, the site speed before and after, and the single biggest target I have still not hit.
That last section is the reason it is worth reading. It names the objective that has not been met and explains why.
Questions about this page
Why is only one client named?
Because only one has agreed to it in writing. Lucca Transportation gave permission, so their case study is published in full. Anyone else stays anonymous until they say otherwise. An agency that publishes a client's name or results without permission will eventually do the same with yours.
How do I know these findings are real?
You cannot verify them from this page, which is a fair objection. What you can do is have the same audit run on your own business for free and check whether the findings hold up against what you already know about your accounts. That is a stronger test than reading someone else's case study.
Do you only work with one client?
Currently yes. WEBsaj is one person with capacity for roughly ten, and takes one client per city. The about page sets out that constraint and the others in full.
Would you find the same things in my business?
Probably some of them. Cannibalisation and a mis-set Google Business Profile are close to universal in this industry. Whether your ad account has the same problems depends on whether anyone has read it recently.
Find out what is wrong with yours
Start with the free week. 35 posts across five platforms on your own accounts, no credit card. The audit comes with it, and you keep everything either way.